The JavaScript Architectural Toolkit. cujoJS is an open, light, flexible architectural toolkit for the web
- Tweets 495
- Following 280
- Followers 385
- Likes 88
RT @briancavalier: one of my goals for today: amd-ify (http://bit.ly/hchwyz) @cujojs Done! // oh no you're not :D
cujoJS retweeted
#poll: should <script> tags get more complicated or should loading & dependency mgmt be a part of JavaScript? i.e. require() and define()
1
dojo is moving to AMD (http://bit.ly/bAmcLp http://bit.ly/akv94n). any objections to cujo doing the same? what do you think of AMD?
thinking about breaking some parts of cujo.js out into micro-frameworks. cssx, for instance. data binding, too. thoughts?
cujoJS retweeted
Got Dojo (and Dijit) to load using RequireJS as the module loader (just a little more work before it is user ready). Interoperability FTW.
3
1
So smitten by requireJS! If u haven't checked it out, do so now. Dojo 2.0 will look exactly the same.
if views are page fragments and widgets are control-like (inputs for instance), what is a tab container or an accordion?
RT @briancavalier: @cujojs is on, go forth and build awesome apps: http://bit.ly/bvAn1M (now with sensible colors)
I'm attending DDD 2010 (#dojo developer day) -- http://www.eventbrite.com/s/1qPh (the webz will never know what hit it)
cujo.requireCss() is already async. coding that may have been the most fun I've had in years. I <3 js promises.
should we make module loading (optionally) async? cujo.requireJs(['my.proj.module1', 'my.proj.module2']).then(function () { /* ??? */ });
just found out that the dojo libs are on github! can I send a pull request for my dojo.store 1.6 patches? if so, sweet! http://bit.ly/dvt8zT